Is this a parody…or is it another maniac who thinks ad-blocking should be illegal? Looking at the two sites, WhyFirefoxIsBlocked.com and WhyDiggIsBlocked.com are very similar.
- The designs are nearly identical, featuring the same blue-and-gray header.
- The sites both offer code to block visitors based on their browser or referral.
- They both talk about how Digg (or Firefox) are ruining the web, or more specifically, the banner ad industry.
Interestingly, “Why Digg Is Blocked” mentions the AdBlock Plus extension for Firefox…the same extension that “Why Firefox is Blocked” is complaining about. Both sites complain about users infringing upon the rights of “the rights of web site owners and developers.” What about the rights of users?
WhyDiggIsBlocked.com is rather ridiculous (as is WhyfirefoxIsBlocked.com) and I wonder if it could be a pardoy of the older site. Or could it be another ridiculous project by the guy who created WhyFirefoxIsBlocked?